Skip to content

Decay markers

As you scroll a file you’ll sometimes see a small decay marker beside a cell — an icon or coloured chip in the cell’s gutter. It’s one of Aquilla’s most useful signals, and also one of the most misunderstood, so it’s worth understanding clearly.

A decay marker means: this cell still needs validation attention.

It is action-framed — it points to work still to do. It is never a “this cell is healthy/done” badge. Crucially:

The absence of a marker is silence, not approval. No marker simply means decay hasn’t crossed the warning threshold — it doesn’t mean a human has confirmed the cell.

The marker only appears once a cell’s decay rises above the warning threshold (two-thirds, or 0.66), so the workspace stays calm and only flags cells that genuinely warrant a look.

Decay measures how far a cell is from being fully validated — not whether the translation is correct.

Here’s the mechanism, in plain terms:

  1. Each validation a cell receives counts as an endorsement.
  2. A project sets how many endorsements a cell needs (its required-validation count). Decay is simply how short of that target the cell is: decay = 1 − (endorsements ÷ required).
  3. A cell that has reached its target has zero decay. A cell no one has validated has full decay — and, once it crosses the threshold, shows a marker.

So decay is really asking: “has a human confirmed this cell yet, or is it still an unreviewed corner of the project?”

You reduce a cell’s decay by getting it validated. As reviewers work through the reviewer queue and validate cells, those cells reach their endorsement target, decay falls, and markers disappear.

Decay is separate from built-in checks. A check violation (like an empty target cell) is its own kind of flag and does not count toward decay. The two answer different questions:

  • Decay / health — “has this been reviewed?”
  • Violations — “does this cell look like it has a problem?”